Your Answer ▼
As an attention and interest of public for an international sports event such as Olympics is increasing, the discussion on this issue is getting serious since some people argue that hosting international sports festivals would be beneficial for the country, whereas others believe this trial would bring a negative effect to the hosting nation. In this essay, I'll deal with both angles as well as reach my perspective which supports the latter. On one hand, some people believe that it can lead to an enormous economic loss for the country to host the international sports since this project require the government to allocate high investments. For example, if the country are planning to locating international events in their territory, they should invest nation's budget not only to promote the events by carrying out several activities such as fireworks display but also to construct many architectures necessary for the sports events. Moreover, the buildings which were constructed only for the festivals are not likely to be utilized as much as before once the events finish. On the other hand, some people opine that being a host of the international sports event means this hosting nation has competitive power around the world and enough quality to lead other countries. Therefore, locating important events covering the world would be an honor for the nation. Moreover, it would be a good means of promoting the nation's allure all around the world since the international sports events are broadcasted in all nations at the same time. As a result, it can attract potential tourists from various countries, which would increase the revenue of the country and have a positive impact on the economic development. For these reasons, although there are several opposing arguments, I personally believe that the country can hold more international competition around the world and improve their economic progress by hosting international sports events.
40분 소요, 312 단어 목표점수 6.5 감사합니다 :) |