Your Answer ▼
It has been enigmatic quandary as to whether it is better to just accept a bad circumtance or to try to improve such situations like unsatisfactory job or shortage of budget. The scope and breadth of accepting what cannot be changed and learning a lesson are two paragon that reflect my point precisely. To begin with, baring the matter cannot be changed in the future lucidly demonstrate the issue pertaining to the theme. Some people assert taht, If there is no way to get through, it is the best option to just accept a bad situation not get stressed out from things that could not be changed in a while. For example, in case of lack of money, you can tighten your belt and buy food or move to the cheaper house on a budget. However, it is obvious that the situation in front of you is not going to be different if further action to fix it is not excuted. On the other hand, learning a lesson from challenge indubitably epitomize my argument mentioned above. Other people belive that you can learn certain lesson from the challenge even if it fail. Furthermore, to illuminate the root cause, it should be on priority to not only try to change the circumtance but also be consistant. For instance, a world famous NBA player which is motive of movie named the blind side was raised a disadvantageous household. However, he could get support fortunately and did his best in a long term then he became a milionaire with fame. At first glance, it may seem like enduring the bad situation is the most reasonable action. But, in case of unchangable, the way descriebed above is the best way. Neverthless, to make a significant change in life, it is undeniable to confront to the suffering. If it is not going well, at least, you can get a courage to face up to another challenge. |