▶ Your Answer : The reading and the lecture both talk about congestion pricing. The reading says that there are some reasons to show that congestion pricing is really beneficial. However, the lecturer argues that the reasons mentioned in the reading are not convincing. Firstly, the reading states that it is congestion pricing that makes driving much safer. In contrast, the lecturer disagrees this statement. He states that if there are few cars on the road, the drivers will likely to speed up and this causes more accident. In addition to this, due to high speed, drivers' injure and death possibility is even worse. Secondly, the reading goes on to say that congestion pricing makes city's public trasportation network becoming more easy to use. On the other hand, the lecturer makes an opposing point to this. The point is that at first it might seem that but in the long term sight, people are maybe even hard to catch bus becuase a lot of people have to use it. Thirdly, the reading argues that it is really helpful to businesses within a city. However, the lecturer contradicts to this claim, arguing that if retailers have to go other city, they must pay charges. So, they said it is not beneficial to them. For these reasons the lecturer disagrees with the statement that mentioned in the reading.
the listening lecturer라고 해주세요. 그래야 화자 구분이 더 잘 이루어집니다. spelling오류는 정말 없어야 하는 오류입니다. proof reading필수라는 것 기억해주세요. 리스닝에 대한 detail이 조금 부족한 편입니다. 적어도2-3문장 정도 더 나오면 balance가 잘 맞을 것 같아요 특히 마지막 main paragraph detail너무 없는 편입니다 지금 단계에서는 intro, conclusion보다는 main paragraph 풍성하게 연습하는 것이 더 중요합니다 |