▶ Your Answer : The reading and the lecture both talk about whether sucralose may cause health problems. The reading says that there are some reasons to show that sucralos is harmful to our health. However, the lecturer argues that the reasons mentioned in the reading are not convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that people have a greater risk of developing diabetes when they eat sucralose. In contrast, the lecturer disagrees with this statement. He states that a lot of other ingrediants can make higher insulin. It is determined by their physical condition. Secondly, the reading goes on to say that when used for cooking, they emit harmful substances. On the other hand, the lecturer makes an opposing point to this claim. The point is that according to the lab test it didn't make any bad substances that may occur bad situation to our health although it cooked in higher temperature than people usually used. Thirdly, the reading asserts that it can set off intense allergic reactions. However, the lecturer contradicts to this statement, arguing that people's experience is not a reliable evidence to make an argument. This is because when people see media, they usually feel as if they were have similar symptoms.
For these reasons mentioned above, the lecturer disagrees with the statement that mentioned in the reading,
reading이랑 listening 주장 나눠서 적은 것은 아주 좋습니다. 그런데 listening detail은 2문장 정도 더 나오면 주장 이해하기가 훨씬 쉬울 것 같습니다. 그리고 reading도 주장 1문장 적기보다는 1문장 정도 더 적어서 주장 흐름이 자연스럽게 이어지도록 하는 것이 좋아요. 통합형 특성상 단어가 어느정도 기본적인 것은 이해하지만 그래도 (주장하다/반대하다) 단어는 더 다양하게 정리해 놓으면 좋을 것 같아요 |