■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that there are several advantages of wave-energy facilities. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
First, the professor contends that wave farms failed to convince one important factor. It is caused by a technical problem, which means that the material used for the facility would be broken down by constant fluctuation. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that wave farms are great generators of power because the wave has constant frequency and predictable intensity. Next, the professor insists that wave-power convector is not made of environmental material. it has a chemical material which is harmful to the ocean environment. For example, a specific component as the professor mentioned is highly toxic, so it could adversely affect the ocean when it leaks out. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that wave farms are environmentally-friendly because there is no pollutant or noxious gasses and it does not have any harmful fuels. Finally, the professor argues that wave farms are highly visible because they are painted with bright color. Furthermore, they are located at a close ashore. Accordingly, they would be easily spotted by tourists from the beach. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that wave-power convectors would not negatively affect the natural scenery of the surrounding landscape because they are tiny and they are usually located at underwater. |
|
1. introduction의 분량을 3문장 이상으로 늘려주세요.
2. reading and listening의 비율이 너무 listening쪽으로만 치우쳐져 있습니다.
비율은 5:5, 적어도 6:4 정도는 되어야 합니다.
이는 리딩에 대한 디테일 부족으로 이어지며, 분량 부족, 추가 설명 실패 등으로 이어질 수 있으니
리딩에서도 evidence를 많이 찾아서 써주시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
3. 문법은 굉장히 깔끔합니다!
수고하셨습니다. *^^*