▶ Your Answer :
Various
opinions may exists over the argument that how do you think the students having
a job. I do not think it is a good idea for them. The idea below can be a valid
evidence to support my view. They should study hard in their school, and they
do not work before they become an adult.
To
begin with, students should study hard in their school. They have a duty to
study hard when they are a student. Also, a government made a law that students
have a right to study. So, the government should protect students’ right; students
have to study until the age of 18. In addition, there is a law that students
should not have a job until the age of 18. So, students are not able to have a
job including a part-time-job. For example, when I was a high school student
especially at the age of 17, there are a lot of students to work a
part-time-job missing their class. Teachers of my school realized this situation;
they immediately visited my friends’ home and met their family. Then teachers
talked to their parents that students should stop working and returning their
class. By the teacher’s effort, my friends could return to school and stop
working. And also, they could avoid a punishment of the government. Like thins,
I think that students should study in their school during their adolescence.
But some students might need to work because of their poverty. These students,
I argue that the government should support to concentrate on their studying.
In
conclusion, there are a lot of students to work at their job rather than to
study. These students, all things considered both the governments’ policy and
students’ duty, I firmly disagree that teenagers have jobs while they are still
students. Therefore, I think that the students should study hard and do not
work during their adolescence and the government should protect them in point of
law.
|