▶ Your Answer : Both the reading passage and listening listing discuss the topic of change of moon
in color or brightness. The author of the reading argues that there are
plausible hypotheses of transient lunar phenomena, whereas the lecturer of the
listening listing refutes these hypotheses. The two passages each provide three reasons
to support their argument.
To begin with, according to the article, the first
possibility is that the phenomena are caused by clouds of lunar gas. Many
scientists think gases of the moon are given off into the thin lunar
atmosphere. However, speaker argues that the gases are not responsible for
TLTs. This is because phenomena is not coincident. In addition, scientists may
not detect how much gases exist in moon.
Furthermore, it is also argued that some specialists
suppose that TLPs are illuminated clouds of dust floating above the lunar
landscape. This means that because particle hit the moon's surface, light is
reflected off the suspended dust. On the contrary, the lecturer claims that
since there is no evidence, it is hard to believe the fact that TLPs are illuminated
clouds of dust.
Finally, the reading passage points out that third hypothesis hypnosis
maintains that solar radiation cause TLPs. Sometimes, magnetic storm on the
sun's surface emits intense bursts of radiation. On the other hand, the
professor says that the data that this phenomenon can prove to be true are
insufficient. Also, information that reading passage provide is not correlation.
Good (24) 서론 -철자 오류
세번째 본문 -철자 오류 -연두색 부분 이해하기 어렵습니다. is not correlated 혹은 is not about correlation으로 바꿔주세요. 문제에서 제공된 내용에 따라.
수고하셨습니다~~ |