▶ Your Answer :
Reading passage contends that 'will-o-the-wisp' which
is mystical has three hypotheses of its existence. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several
points that contradict this argument. First of all,
the lecturer argues that it is hard for chemical reaction of gases to make the
will-o-the-wisp. It is because that light from reaction of gas on the ground with
other gases in the air more look like green. However, the will-o-the-wisp has a
warm and yellow light. Thus, it cannot can’t be the cause of the will-o-the-wisp. Second,
according to the lecture, fireflies are not the answer of this phenomenon.
While it may look like these flying insects create the light, in fact it does not doesn’t.
It is because fireflies make flashing and blinking lights which are appeared in
large area. On the other hand, the will-o-the-wisp makes steady lights which
exist in the small area. Therefore, this point refutes the reading passage’s
assertion that this phenomenon is caused by fireflies. The final
point made by the lecturer is that the will-o-the-wisp is not result of the barn
owls’ feathers. This is due to the fact that barn owls’ feathers are not that
shining. Also they have to be surrounded by lots of lights to make the will-o-the-wisp.
Although it is possible that it makes light by bouncing the light through their
feathers, it is more plausible to believe that it is just a hypothesis. These
facts counter the writer’s claim that the will-o-the-wisp is what barn owls’
feathers made.
Good (24–30)
서론 -어떤 것에 대한 가설인지 구체적으로 알려주세요.
첫번째 본문, 두번째 본문 -축약형 지양해주세요. can't-->cannot, doesn't-->does not
내용 정리 잘 하셨습니다.
수고하셨습니다~
|