Attitudes conflict on whether cars have made greater impact on society than airplanes. I stand for proponents of the view that cars have changed society in a huge impact. First, cars allow us to save time and energy in our daily life. Second, airplanes are risky and dangerous of which crucial accidents are inevitable.
^
Fundamentally, cars save our time and energy in our normal life. The opposing side argues that airplanes have influenced more on society. Advocates of this school of thought raise several arguments as the basis for their beliefs. While their argumentation may appear valid on the surface, it does not withstand vigorous scrutiny. Actually, a flood of evidence render their views erroneous. For instance, my particular observation reveals why cars are more influential on society. When I commute to my work place, it takes me more than one hour every day. However, if I drive by car, it is only 15 minutes of a distance. Even more, by taking public transportation I am squeezed with a number of people standing until I arrive which makes me exhausted ing even before I begin to work. This results directly in work efficiency. (It causes negative influence on duties.) On the other hand, the day I drive to work, it enables me to finish work on time and enjoy the rest of the day with family. This supports the thesis that cars have influenced in a greater way.
^
In the second place, the accidents of airplanes are inevitable which are extremely dangerous. Beyond my personal experience, current research substantiates my perspective aApart from a small portion of people who sided with the opposite idea, a significant majority of survey participants endorsed my point of view that airplanes have made negative impact on society. A woman who took part in the research said that cars have influenced largely positively on society compared to airplanes. She said both technological improvement brought up additional accidents which did not exist but the ones associated with airplanes are much severe which directly lead people to death. She gives an example of 911 terror. This disaster was inevitable even after the United States army detected because there exited a trade-off of either saving people in the airplane or saving the rest of people in the tower. Consequently, more than a hundred people died with the additional economical loss. Such notions attest that greater impact on society was made by cars.
^
Ultimately, cars influenced bigger than airplane in a positive way on society for the evidence I have provided previously. First of all, people can save time and energy which is possible with cars. Last but not least, airplanes are dangerous which takes away many people’s lives in a high possibility.
Fair/ Good (22-25)
첫번째 본문
-주어가 지친 것은 exhausted, 주어가 지치게 하는 것은 exhausting 입니다.
-괄호 사용 지양해주세요.
두번째 본문
-대소문자 오류
-본문의 내용만 읽었을 때는 비행기가 더 영향을 많이 끼친것으로 들립니다. 토픽에는 좋은/나쁜 영향 명시하지 않았고 어느 것이 '더' 영향을 끼쳤는지에 대해서만 묻습니다. 따라서, 본인의 주장과 상반될 수 있는 내용입니다. 유의해주세요.
수고하셨습니다~~