▶ Your Answer :
The
reading passage contends that congestion charge imposed on vehicles will be
beneficial for local community by giving three explanations. On the other hand,
the speaker brings up three points to contradict the argument. ^
First
of all, the speaker argues that it is not true that imposing congestion charge
makes driving much safer due to the fact that the number of cars will be
decreasing. However, the lack number of cars on the street causes the increase
of speed, and the accident will be more severe. The national statistics showed
that 30 percent increase in vehicles speed yields the double serious injury or
death rate. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that congestion
pricing encourages people to drive in safety. ^
In
addition, the lecturer asserts that public transits will become less convenient
in the long term. If people do not don’t use their own cars, people who want to use
public transportation system will be increasing. As a result, the public
transits will be overcrowded with people. People have in trouble catching a
bus, and waiting time will be extended. This refutes the reading passage’s
claim that this system allows people to use public transits more comfortable. ^
Last
but not least, the final point made by lecturer is that congestion fee does not
match with the real situation. For retailers, this system will be burdensome of
their annual budget, because they should pay congestion charge when they deliver
their goods to other places. As a result, the amount of profits will be
decreasing. In reality, the survey showed that most of retailers blamed for
this policy. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that congestion
charge positively affects the local business.
Good (24–30) 축약형 지양해주세요. don't--> do not have in trouble-->have trouble in/have trouble
전체적으로 내용 정리 잘하셨습니다. 자잘한 문법실수 유의해주세요. 수고하셨습니다~
|