▶ Your Answer :
Attitudes conflict on whether cars have made greater
impact on society than airplanes. I stand for proponents of the view that cars have changed
society in a huge impact. First,
cars allow us save time and energy in our daily life. Second, airplanes are risky and dangerous
of which crucial accidents are inevitable.
Fundamentally, cars save our time and energy in
our normal life. The
opposing side argues that airplanes have influenced more on society. Advocates of this school of
thought raise several arguments as the basis for their beliefs. While their argumentation may appear valid on
the surface, it does not withstand vigorous scrutiny. Actually, a flood of
evidence render their views erroneous. For instance, my particular
observation reveals why cars are more influential on society. When I commute to
my work place, it takes me more than one hour every day. However, if I drive by
car it is only 15 minutes of a distance. Even more, by taking public
transportation I am squeezed with a number of people standing until I arrive
which makes me exhausting even before I begin to work. This result directly in
work efficiency. (It causes negative influence on duties.) On the other hand,
the day I drive to work, enables me to finish work on time and enjoy the rest
of the day with family. This supports the thesis that
cars have influenced in a greater way.
In the second place, the accidents of airplanes
are inevitable which are extremely dangerous. Beyond my personal experience, current research substantiates
my perspective Apart from a small portion of people who sided with the opposite
idea, a significant majority of survey participants endorsed my point of view
that airplanes have made negative impact on society. A woman who took part in the
research said that cars have influenced largely positively on society
compared to airplanes. She said both technological improvement brought up
additional accidents which did not exist but the one associated with airplanes
are much severe which directly lead people to death. She gives an example of
911 terror. This disaster was inevitable even after the United States army
detected because there exited a trade-off of either saving people in the
airplane or saving the rest of people in the tower. Consequently, more than a
hundred people died with the additional economical loss. Such notions attest that
greater impact on society was made by cars.
Ultimately, cars influenced bigger than
airplane in a positive way on society for the evidence I have provided
previously. First of all,
people can save time and energy which is possible with cars. Last but not least, airplanes
are dangerous which takes away many people’s lives in a high possibility.
|