Undoubtedly, rules
play a significant role in people’s daily lives in many places where they work
or play. Some people think that strict rules for their children are needed for them to succeed in life, while others do not. Both
sides may have reasons to support their views. On the other hand, if I had to
choose one, I would say that parents should not regulate their children for
success in life. There are several reasons as follows.
To begin with, children who are not
regulated by their parents can improve a the
sense of responsibility. If the children make a plan by
their own hands, they can learn how to manage their time, abide by rules
(규칙을 안 정해주면 좋은 이유들을 적고 있는데, 규칙을
따른다고 하면 논리적으로 조금 어색합니다), and use their
money. When such abilities are fulfilled, it is likely to bring a good result
in their life. For instance, when my younger brother was in a high
school, he was depressed by restricting the
restriction of his behaviors from his parents. When his parents decided
to give him a chance to plan his routine on his own, he was excited and was
able to get out of his exhausting routine. Also,
he realized that making plans by his own hands
required many obligations such as punctuality, a sense of responsibility on their
tasks, and effective use of budget. This implies that free rules the absence of rules for children can be important for them to succeed in life. Without this
freedom, he would fall behind.
On top of that, I firmly believe that
children who don’t have strict rules can cultivate important qualifications
needed for great success. If parents don’t set strict rules for their children,
children they would express their own
ideas without hesitation and study more effectively. This trend is likely to help them improve in academic performance. For
example, Stanford University found a huge difference between two groups of
young students in terms of SAT scores. One group was composed of those who were
not regulated by their parents strictly, and the
other group consisted of those who had a rigid rules. The researcher found that
the former was outperformed the latter by 20 percent. The first group was
likely to have a higher more sense of
achievement on their tasks and actively participate in activities. On the other hand, the second group had a passive
attitude and easily got exhausted on their
tasks. This indicates that freedom in their life encourages children to
accomplish their tasks actively.
All things considered, I believe that
having a freedom to children is better than restricting their
children them. The children can cultivate
important qualifications and improve their sense of responsibility needed for
success in life without strict rules. All in all, these things will continue to
consider encouraging their children’s abilities