▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support to the author's claim that the female pope 'Pope Joan' whom who was mentioned in Cahtolic Church's legend was real figure. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as rebuttal to the author's point.
First of all, he (여기서 he가 author인지 lecturer인지 명시해주세요) contends that the documents which reading passage mentioned were mentioned in the reading passage was appeared 400 years after from the time Pope Joan existed. He points out that there is no other documents that had written in the time close to when Pope Joan was alive. The all All the references about Pope Joan was appeared after 1300s. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that there are over 500 detailed historical documets that proof prove the existence of Pope Joan.
In addition, he (he가 누군지) insists that the Catholic Church didn't say Pope Joan was real figure indeed. This is because they recorded Pope Joan on the statue due to the fact that her story was very popular legend. So This means that the church confirmed the existence of Pope Joan for the political reasons. This view is on direct opposition to the reading passage's assertion that Tthe Catholic Church confirmed Pope Joan as a real figure initially.
Finally, he argues that the biography of popes by the Catholic Church's chief librarian was false. He supports his view by saying mentioning the reference about Pope Joan was written at the bottom of the page and it was wirtten in the defferent hand writting. This might be written additionally to give credibility to the legend. This counters the reading passage's suggestion that the biography of all popes which was written by church librarian mentioned Pope Joan as a real figure.
[Score] 27-28 [Feedback] - 전반적으로 잘 써진 글입니다. Reading passage와 lecture의 포인트들을 잘 짚어주었어요. - 다만, 문단의 시작에서 he라고 애매하게 지칭하는 것은 삼가주세요. 또한, minor한 문법적 오류들을 줄인다면 더욱 고득점을 받을 수 있을 것 같습니다~ |