▶ Your Answer : The lecturer argues that the forgery made by Michelangelo is not true. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that the sculpture is a forgery created by Michelangelo rather than the original Greek sculpture.
First, the lecturer claims that Michelangelo did not forge to trick his rival. In fact, they Sangallo and Michelangelo were close friends and Sangallo needed Michelangelo’s help to identify the sculpture. Michelangelo did not want to trick his friend. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that Michelangelo have forged the sculpture to deceive his rival.
Next, the lecturer contends that Michelangelo was just influenced by the sculpture. Michelangelo showed reaction on this the sculpture and said that it was a profound work. Thus, his later work, The Last Judgement, was affected by the Laocoon and this is the reason for their similarities. This counters the reading passage’s claim that the resemblance between two works means that he forged the Laocoon.
Finally, the lecturer points out that forgery was a serious crime in Michelangelo’s time. Replicating artworks was common and popular but it was totally different from forgery. Forgery was regarded as tricks at those days. If artists who forged were caught, they even received penalties of death. This refuted the reading passage’s claim that the sculpture is Michelangelo’s forgery because it was commonly done.
Comment : 각 본론에서 대립되는 포인트가 명확한 점이 좋습니다. 두 지문이 대립하는 입장이 '위작이 미켈란젤로가 한 것이냐/아니냐'로 대립하는 것인지, 아니면 '미켈란젤로가 위작을 만든 이유가 이것이다/아니다'로 대립하는 것인지 서론에서 명확히 정리한다면 좀 더 매끄러운 요약이 될 것 같아요. 실제 지문과 비교하면서 불필요한 내용이 들어간 부분이나 필요한데 빠진 내용은 없는지 한 번 더 검토해주세요~ 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 4/5 A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas. |