Opinions might be divided
over whether universities should invest their
budget in infrastructure and physical plant or in keeping the faculty
satisfied. People of various ages and from different walks of life may take
diverse positions on this controversial issue. Some believe that having the
faculty members contended with their workplace is much more important than in
investing in infrastructure for universities. However, if we take a closer look
at their the issue, it is more reasonable to subsidize their budget on infrastructure
and physical plant.
To begin with, making the
building and facilities better would make all the people related to
universities satisfied with them. I think that the amount of money
given to them is not all the thing. (무슨 뜻인지 파악이 어렵습니다) The environment of studying and working is one of the
most important factors to affect a feeling of satisfaction. When I was a
freshman, my university decided to rebuild most of the facilities because it
was worn out. At first, the student union
objected the policy because they would be uncomfortable during the construction
and remodeling. However, after the completion of the remodeling, all the people
related to the university were satisfied with the remodeled infrastructure. The
building became clean and convenient for students and faculty. Moreover, many
facilities were in a short (마찬가지로 파악이 어려워요) before the rebuilding. But after the reconstruction,
most of the facilities became enough for students and faculty to enjoy these
buildings. The same situation can apply to those which invest in infrastructure
and physical plant rather than in other field.
On top of that,
universities is are not only educational
institutions, but also research institutions. If the infrastructure to study
and research on their own projects is improved and developed greatly, so do
will the quality and the achievement of research
and studies. A few weeks ago, I had a chance to read an article which was
related to the topic. It described the result of an assessment of universities
in Korea, and Seoul National Universities University
was evaluated as the most prestigious university in Korea. The article added
that the assessment was done in a criteria of the performance and achievement
in the research area. They went on to say that
the reason they could get high scores in the assessment was that they had
invested in infrastructure for professors' laboratories. The refined and
cutting-edge equipment and well-developed research environment also supported
the result of research. This clearly proves that investing in infrastructure
has much more benefits than in satisfying the faculty members.
As I mentioned
above, based on my personal example and the article, I can conclude that making
an investment in infrastructure has much more advantages than doing
in satisfying the faculty
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
17 |
Overall
Comment: |
뜻을 파악하기 어려운 표현들이 몇
가지 있었습니다. The와 같은 전치사 사용 연습이 필요하실 것 같습니다. 위에 문법 지적사항들을 적어 놓았으니 참고하세요. |
|