▶ Your Answer :
Reading passage contends that the congestion pricing is efficient to local business. It says that even though the controversies among the residents of the urban areas, significant three benefits exist. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. Fisrt of all, the speaker argues that it is hard to reduce traffic injuries by using the congestion pricing. It is because that this makes cars go faster and then accidents will appear. There was a study in 2013 which government interested in. They highlighted that car's speed is the key of material which causes accidents and the congenstion pricing will reduce the speed of cars. Second, wWhile it may look like that it makes us be convenient to use lower number of cars and can make stayble schedules,. iIn fact it does not doesn’t. Moreover it will be less useful for user in the long terms. For instance t, less bus on the rload, less method to go important meeting. This implies that lack of traffic transitions cannot can't make business go well in the reality. Therefore, this point refutes the reading passage’s assertion that the congestion pricing is more convenient.
The final point made by the lecturer is that even retailer blame the charging. This is due to the fact that the congestion pricing causes retailer to cost a lot. Although it is possible to control exceess of fuel and delivery delays, with the congestion pricing retailer systems will go uneffective ways.
Good (24) 두번째 본문 -대소문자 오류 -축약형 지양해주세요. -for instance--예를 들어 -while 주어+동사, 주어+동사 로 써주세요.
전체적으로 내용 정리 괜찮습니다. 문법 연습 많이 해주세요.
수고하셨습니다~
|