▶ Your Answer :
In the given set of materials, there is some discrepancy between the viewpoints of the lecturer and the author. (On what subject?) The lecturer affirms that indeed, hiring employees for four-day per week is more advantageous rather than working five days a week typically, whereas the author suggests otherwise.
To begin with, the lecturer debunks the author's first conjecture. (State it) To elaborate in detail, the lecturer states that offering four-day working probably can costs a lot of money. This is because companies should be responsible for training workers and guaranteeing their medical benefits like insurances. Furthermore, the professor he/she also argues that larger space and more computers will be need to accommodate more employees. (What leads to a increase in the number of employees?) This casts doubt on the reading passage's assertion that taking the option mentioned above will be beneficial for increasing profits because less workweek can make workers feel more relaxed and concentrated in workplace.
On top of that, the speaker also indicates dissent over the reading passage's idea on reducing unemployment rates. The lecturer sounds convinced that the author is making a manifest error since people can have more free time due to the changed working policy so that they can choose many job available. It means that people who work will be expect do their works in advance when it used to be done in 5 days for doing more works in other workplace. (Hard to get the meaning, Wrong grammar structure) However, the author clarifies that decreasing a number of full-time employees will be helpful for creating more job opportunities.
Third, the lecturer goes on to expound that the author's final point on having free individual times for workers is flawed. To corroborate this opinion, the lecturer mentions that people do not want to earn less money due to the new policy. On the other hand. people also will lose their opportunities to develop their job career. (Why's that?) This counters the reading passage's argument that workers can enjoy their free time for pursuing private interest or assorted leisure activities.
With three convincing ideas that the lecturer posits, the assumptions made by the reading passage are all rendered groundless.
채점기준표
|
Grammar
|
Contents
|
Example
|
Coherence
|
점수
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
Score
|
Limited 15-18
|
- 언급한 general part내용들이 불필요하게 길기 때문에 관련성이 없는 부분들은 지워주시는 것이 좋습니다. - 통합형 파트에서는 결론이 불필요 합니다. - 근거와 이유를 명확히 밝혀주세요.
|
|