▶ Your Answer :
The
lecturer asserts that many theories on the transient lunar phenomena, or as
known as TLP, do not explain why it happens. This counters the reading
passage’s claim that there are a number of plausible hypotheses to explain the
cause of the phenomena.
First, in response to the reading passage, the lecturer says that it is a
coincidence that the TLPs happen in vicinity of the craters. Also, the speaker
mentions that the gases emitted from the craters
are too small and the small gases can’t be observed from the Earth. This
directly contradicts the claim that the clouds of lunar gas, in vicinity of the
craters, are causing the phenomena mentioned in the reading passage.
Second, the lecturer contests the reading passage’s assertion by saying
that the dust should be very large to be observed. The speaker explains that in
fact, the dust are is very little. He
also mentions that the astronaut who walked on the Moon reported that fine
the dust particles found
were tiny. This explanation refutes the reading passage’s claim that
dust floating above the ground is the cause of the TLPs.
Finally
the lecturer refutes the reading by saying that there is no correlation between
the solar radiation and the TLPs. He explains that they are sometimes matched,
but they are often not matched. He says that this correlation theory was once
prevalent, but there is no data to support this theory. This goes against the
reading passage’s assertion that solar radiation is the reason for the TLPs
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Good (24-30) |
Score |
28 |
Overall
Comment: |
Excellent! 두 입장 비교가
매우 좋습니다. 아주 사소한 문법 오류들을 고쳐드렸으니 참고하세요. |
|
|