▶ Your Answer :
Both the reading and the listening mainly talk about the causes of transient lunar phenomena, or TLPs. While the reading passage gives three possible explanations about the topic, the lecturer refutes those ideas by pointing out some dismissed facts (Awkward meaning) on them.
First of all, the reading insists that when underground gas leaks out through the Moon's craters, and itforms colored gas clouds which are noticed as TLPs. On the contrary, the listening disagrees with this opinion by mentioning there’s no such strong causal relationship between the TLPs and lunar craters. To explain, it is just an accident that TLPs are often observed near craters. (Why is this accident?) This happens because craters are on the most part of lunar surface. Moreover, the gas clouds might have not been big enough to be seen from Earth. (What does this mean?)
Secondly, the article claims that TLPs occurs when the clouds of dust around the Moon are lit up. Contradictorily, the professor doesn’t think this as a reliable assumption due to the lack of evidence. If it is true that dust causes TLPs, there should be huge dust storm which is conspicuous from the Earth. Additionally, the astronaut who explored the Moon discovered only little amount of dust.
Finally, the writer contends that solar flare brings out TLPs. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this because this claim lacks important data. (Describe data in detail) By comparing the date when solar radiation and TLPs happened, researchers realized the correlation between the two doesn’t exist.
| 채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Score | Fair 17-20 | - 이유가 세 가지 이므로 cause가 아니라 causes로 언급해줄 수 있도록 해주세요. - 의미가 모호하게 해석이 되거나, 어색한 문장들이 종종 보입니다. - 첫 번째와 세 번째 예시의 과정을 보다 보완해주셔야 합니다.
|
|