▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that
incentives as a means of stimulating economic growth are an excellent approach since incentives help attract
new business form from outside the local
area. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal
to the author's point.
First of all, the professor contends that the
first reason (first reason이 뭔지 먼저 설명하셔야 해요.) cannot be a case in this situation. He argues that considering about the tax
rebate, the income of the local government does
not increase through additional property taxes. This casts doubt on the reading
passage's claim that incentives will enlarge the tax revenue available for
local investment.
Next, the professor insists that using incentives to draw businesses cannot create a lot of new jobs for local people.
If the companies build new facilities such as factories, there are
many would be severe competition. Therefore,
it can leads that people lose to people
losing their jobs. This counters the reading passage's suggestion that
optimizing incentives to allure businesses
cannot make many new jobs for local people.
Finally, the
professor argues that it is not going to be profitable to the local
environment. It is also true that green companies contribute to the high
quality of air and water. However, he argues that
regarding about some conventional factors (뭔지 설명하세요) it cannot become a great reason. This refutes the reading passage's
assertion that incentives will be beneficial to the local environment.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
17 |
Overall
Comment: |
문법 오류들은 위 지적사항들을
참고하세요. 문법 오류 때문에 감점을 많이 드렸습니다. 추가적으로 좀 더 디테일하게 설명하실 필요가 있습니다. |
|
|