▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that demise of
Angkor which is a sprawling urban area in the ancient Khmer Empire is fully
explained by three theories. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points
to retract this arguments.
First, the lecturer argues that it is
unlikely that the Black Death leaded Angkor’s ruin. This is because plague
spread followed the ships in the most case, so coastal city was usually
suffered from plague. Therefore, it does is not make sense that people of Angkor were
decimated by plague because Angkor was inland areas. Also, this is
controversial that the Black Death was in south east Asia. This casts doubt on
the reading passage’s argument that the plague caused Angkor’s ruin.
Second, according to the lecturer, it is
not true that the failed water system resulted in Angkor’s fall. The reason is that
only half of the population of the city could survive if water system had a
problem because water system played a significant role in city. Therefore,
Angkor could have another resource of water and make up the shortage of water needed
for cops and population. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that the Angkor’s
demise resulted from flaws of water system.
The final points made by the lecturer is
that maritime trade gave rise to the end of Angkor. This is supported by the
fact that Angkor was still center of trade although maritime trade was
increasing because they had agriculture trade. Coastal cities only trade luxury
items such as pottery. Therefore, the economy of Angkor was not affected by coastal
cities’ flourishing. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that the
Angkor’s fall is affected by ruin of Angkor’s economy.
Good (24–30)
첫번째 본문 -존재로서가 아닌 좀더 생각/행동/능동적인 경우에는 is 동사 말고 do 동사 씁니다. 세번째 본문 -point 한 개이므로 the final points-->the final point
내용 정리 괜찮습니다. 언급된 오류들 개선해주세요.
수고하셨습니다~~
|