In the reading
passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that fledging industry
severely hampers the ability of scientists to conduct research. However, the
professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's
contention.
First of all, the
professor contends that private trade of fossils does not make it difficult to
access areas of ground containing fossils for academic institutions. For
example, there was free chance to search for fossils discovered in private area
in certain case. Also, the government can permit to find out information for
who is planning public investigation. This casts doubt on the reading passage's
assertion that land usage becaome
restricted by commercial fossil hunters who charge high fees for research so it
is hard to conduct study.
Next, the professor
insists that fewer available sample does not resulted from the private
trade of fossils. Actually, museums already have plenty of samples but they
just collect it rather than study with it. This refutes to the reading
passage's suggestion that private collectors buy newly excavated fossils so
scientists cannot get samples to research. As a result, the number of available
samples is decreasing now.
Finally, the
professor argues that it is not true that excavations for private sale are
often damaged and limited. In fact, the private transporters have duty to move
samples undamaged and cared because due
to they cannot get money for collectors if fossils' condition is bad. This
counters to the reading passage’s claim argument that fossils are often
damaged through shipping by companies and there are still at risks for being
handled by people without relevant trainings.
Good (24-26)
첫번째 본문
-문맥상 과거이므로 became으로 해주세요.
세번째 본문
-due to 뒤에는 명사가 나와야합니다. 따라서, due to 뒤에 명사 써주시던가, because 로 바꾸어주세요.
-claim과 argument 같은 뜻의 단어이므로
하나만 써주세요.
내용 정리 잘 하셨습니다. 문법 실수들 개선해주세요.
수고하셨습니다~~