▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage and the lecture are both about the wave energy
facilities. The author of the reading believes that the wave – energy
facilities will be used commonly in the future. The lecturer opposes the
specific points made in the reading.
First of all, the lecturer points out that the wave farms cannot generate energy
well. This is attributed to the fact that there are some technical problems in
using new technologies, and that because of the
harsh marine environment, it is not easy to make
use of waves. This refutes that the author’s point that the wave energy
facilities are reliable power generators.
Moreover, in the lecture, the point is made that
wave-energy facilities are not environmentally friendly. This is because that
the facilities use harmful chemicals which can damage ocean ecosystems. The
chemicals are toxic therefore, they are able to make adverse effects. This casts doubt on the idea in the reading
passage’s that the wave – energy facilities have no risk of contamination
contaminating the of ocean.
The final point made by the lecturer is that the
facilities are noticeable to the people around
them. It is obvious that the buildings are highly visible due to their bright
colors. In addition, the shipping vessels are also able to have a
negative effect on the landscape. This is different from the passage’s view
that the wave – energy facilities affect negatively on their surrounding
landscape. (잘못
적으셨어요. 리딩은 오히려 반대로 시설들이 외관상 보기 좋을 거라고 명시 했습니다.)
While both the reading passage and the lecturer deal
with wave - energy facilities, the lecturer opposes all of the specific points
presented in the reading.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Good (24-30) |
Score |
24 |
Overall
Comment: |
좋습니다. 문법 오류들이 조금
있으니 위 지적사항들을 참고하세요. 본문 마지막 문단 마지막 문장에 오류가 있으니 참고하세요. |
|
|