▶ Your Answer :
[intro 한 문단으로 합쳐주세요] In the reading passage, their is ample support for the author's claim that coal has diverse merits, so it will be exploited continuously in the future. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal that coal is unlikely to be used as an energy source much any longer. [body1 한 문단으로 합쳐주세요] First, the professor argues that mining coal is a complicated process. The amount of coal on the surface is limited and almost exhausted. Thus, the miners must dig soil deeply, which means that more technical skills and workers are required. This refutes the reading passage's claim that coal can be extracted with less time and effort and does not require special equipment. [body2 한 문단으로 합쳐주세요] Next, the professor insists that coal is costly to ship. Because coal is heavy and bulky, a bunch of trucks and trains are required when coal is moved from a mine to a power plant. The result is that coal transporting is significantly expensive than other fuels. This contradicts the reading passage's suggestion that the cost of safe transportation transprotation is low since coal is very safe. [body3 한 문단으로 합쳐주세요] Finally, the professor contends that it is not true that coal industry will create more job opportunities. Coal mining companies are putting enormous effort on reducing the cost of mining by developing technology. When coal extraction process is improved, fewer human operators are needed. And this trend is likely to continue.
This means that the employment of mining companies will even decline in the future.
tThis counters the reading passage's assertion that coal industry will flourish and produce more jobs workers due to the country's energy requirements.
Comment : 두 지문의 대립되는 내용을 잘 파악해주신 것 같아요. 문단별로 묶어서 내용 구획이 잘 나뉘도록 정리해주세요. 반복적인 내용을 줄이고 핵심 내용만 담아서 200단어가 넘지 않는 분량의 요약문을 만드는 데 유의하시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 4.5/5 A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas. |