▶ Your Answer : The reading passage claims that the school shouldn't compel students to do community service. However, the lecturer sees compulsory community service positively, and refutes the passage in 3 ways.
First of all, the lecturer suggests that schools can successfully assess student's voluntary works. He says that many school have their own community service plans and evaluation criteria. This contradicts the reading passage's statement that schools cannot provide fair evaluation program for student's community service.
Next, the professor insists that even if students are forced to do the services, they can still earn insprirations. He explains that a student who served at the hospital may have lessons from that experience and be a doctor. As such, while the reading passage contended that students will percieve community service in a distorted way, the lecturer opposes it by arguing that mandatory services can still give values.
Finally, the lecturer states that most of the systems of school didn't get approvals from students reagarding community service. The reading passage stressed that compulsory volunteering works are abusing student's right, but the professor argues that other systems such as homework and attendence are also compelling the students, so community service is just another case of those mandates.
In conclusion, the lecturer disagrees with the reading passage's main statement that community service should not be included in school curriculum. |