▶ Your Answer :
The speaker disagrees with the autoor's assertion about Moai stones. The lecture states the points in the passage have flaws.
First, the speaker explains that the claim about a sled is wrong. We need to take look at sled transportation more closely. Using this method needs a significant work force. However, the islanders were divided to many groups and competed against each other. In addition, the statues were too heavy for them to transport. This is in opposition to the author's idea that the islanders transported the stones using a sled.
Second, the speaker maintains that the argument about walking the Moai is mistaken. The experiment in the passage is not a good evidence. The walking method would have caused damage on the base of statue. But, the damage was not discovered. Also, with this method, the distance to move the Moai was been limited. This is in contrast to the author's opinion that the islanders was able to move the Moai using this method.
Finally, the speaker says that the opinion about wooden rollers is flawed. Because moving the statues was very hard to control and this method was dangerous. Because of many hills, the Moai would have been broken if they had used rollers. However, broken remnants of the statue were not found. This differs from the author's view that the islanders rolled the Moai using the wooden sled.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
LIMITED
|
LIMITED
|
LIMITED
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- 쉼표 및 띄어 쓰기 사용 주의해주세요. - 고유 명사의 경우 대문자로 시작해야 합니다. - Spelling error 가 많습니다. 주의해주세요. - We can conclude 등의 We 로 사용하는 문장이 아닌 객관화된 내용을 요약한다는 느낌으로 내용을 작성해주세요.
|