▶ Your Answer :
Undoubtedly, scientific discoveries
play a significant role in people lives in many of places where they work or
study. Some people think that the duty for the adverse results of scientific
discoveries should not to go scientists, while others do not. Both sides may
have their own reasons to support their views. If I were asked to choose one, I
would say that scientists do not have obligation about the negative results of
scientific discoveries. There are several reasons as follows.
To
begin with, it is impossible for scientists to predict the scientific results
when they discover. No one could not assure whether results of scientific
finding would be negative or positive for people’s lives. The responsibility
for the adverse results of scientific discoveries is attributed to people who
exploited these founding in a negative way. For example, when Tomas Edison
discovered some theory, he could not realize that his theory was used for
making atom bombs. He just did a crucial role as a scientist. This implies that
responsible for people who made the negative results.
In
addition, every technologies and scientific theories have both the positive and
negative aspects. In other words, scientific discoveries of scientists could
not bring only the positive results. Developing industry and technology lead to
devastate the environments. An destroyed environment tends to be negative for
people’s lives. For instance, when people found theories about coal of
production, it helped people to be comfortable and gave them a chance to use gases
cheaper price than previously they used. Unfortunately, as people have used the
coal gas, an environment became devastated.
All
things considered, I strongly believe that it is unlikely that scientific
discoveries give people only advantages impacts for the reasons I have mentioned above.
All in all, it cannot be overestimated that the negative results of scientific
discoveries have not responsibility for scientist.
|