In the given set of information, both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss sucralose, an artificial sweetener sweetner in many products. The lecturer casts doubt on the author's assertion on health issues associated with sucralose, by presenting three counter-arguments.
First, the lecturer asserts that sucralose is unlikely to be the cause of diabetes. He says that other substances like starch in rice can cause diabetes. Also, overweight people who drink diet soda develop diabetes due to obesity not because of sucralose. This counters the author's claim that sucralose increases the risk of developing diabetes.
Second, the lecturer claims that laboratory experiment that showed the negative aspect of heating sucralose is problematic. This is because the experiment did not involve real ingredients used for cooking and the reserchers researchers heated the sucralose at a higher temperature than it is normally heated. This refutes the author's assertion that heating sucralose produces toxic substances.
Lastly, the lecturer indicates that sucralose as the cause of an allergic reaction is disputable. He claims that after the media announced the problems of sucralose, people simply imagined immagined as if they had the allergic reactions. Moreover, tests proved that consumption of sucralose is safe. This opposes the author's claim that sucralose provokes allergic reactions.
Comment : 두 지문의 입장과 요지들을 각각 본론에서 잘 정리해주신 것으로 보입니다. 실제 지문과 비교대조하면서 잘못 정리된 내용이나 detail이 빠진 부분은 없는지만 한 번 더 검토해주시면 될 것 같아요. 수일치 관련 표현에 유의해주세요~ 수고 많으셨습니다~! Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 4.5/5 A response at this level successfully selects the important information from the lecture and coherently and accurately presents this information in relation to the relevant information presented in the reading. The response is well organized, and occasional language errors that are present do not result in inaccurate or imprecise presentation of content or connections.
|