▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that there are several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds caused by glass materials. But the lecturer brings about several points that the argument may not seem convincing. ^
First, the lecturer states that one-way glass is not beneficial for preventing injuries to birds. It is Bbecause this glass reflects something like a mirror, but bird cannot understand the mirror. For example, if they see trees or sky in one-way glass like the mirror, they would fly right into the glass. Therefore, the lecturer rebuts the argument in the fact that one-way glass is not a solution to hamper injuries to birds.
^
Second, according to the lecturer, colorful designs are difficult to solve the problems that birds' injuries caused by glass. This is supported by the fact that colorful designs have opening holes which people inside are able to see out. However, these openings give rise to injuries to birds because birds perceive this opening as a hole, and thus they fly right through it. Furthermore, it leads to another problem that people inside the colorful glasses are in dark ambiance. Hence, the speaker argues that colorful designs are also attributable to injuries to birds.
^ Lastly, the speaker says that making artificial magnetic fields is not a better way to hinder injuries to birds. The reason is that although it is true that birds perceive magnetic fields to find a way, they use that only in a long distance such as migration from cold to warm weather. However, in this case, they travel relatively short distance from one city to another, and thus they just use their eyes and light brightness to locate their ways. Therefore, the lecturer contradicts the argument that creating an artificial magnetic field has not positively influence on solving the problem that glass leads to injuries to birds.
Good (24–30) 첫번째 본문에서, because 주어+동사, 주어+동사 /혹은/ 주어+동사 because 주어+동사 로 쓰셔야 합니다.
전체적으로 내용 정리 잘하셨고 문법 실수 많이 없으시네요. 수고하셨습니다~
|