▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage claims
that the Etruscans who thrived in northern Italy two thousand years ago came
from Turkey. However, the lecturer opposes the the reading passage’s argument by providing
specific reasons.
First, the lecturer argues
that Etruscans’ DNA which is
similar with the Turks’ can not be the
evidence because it is damaged. To be more specific, it is found in ancient
site with thousands of years passed, so DNA would be damaged. Moreover, it
would be contaminated by wind, rain and other operations. This contradicts the
reading passage’s opinion that
DNA is the evidence to show the Etruscan is from Turkey.
Second, the lecturer asserts
that the language usage of Etruscans which is similar with Turkey cannot be the
evidence. There are lots of linguistical similarity among the language all over
the word. And also there is a possibility that Etruscans was the only survival
member who used alphabetic language. This counters the reading passage’s opinion that using similar
language is the evidence.
Finally, the lecturer points
out that there is no connection with sharing funerary practices between
Etruscans and Turkish. There existed sharing funerary practices far before
Etruscans existed, and they would be one of the successor. This casts doubt on
the reading passage’s claim that the
practices from Etruscans is the evidence.
Good (24–30) can not이 아니라 cannot으로 써주세요.
전체적으로 내용 정리 잘 하셨고, 문법도 괜찮습니다. 수고하셨습니다~
|