In the lecture, the
speaker argues that the reading’s point is groundless. (Reading’s
point가 무엇인지 명시하세요.)
This casts doubt on
the reading passage’s claim that chimpanzees can learn and use complex
language just as humans do.
To begin with, the
lecturer maintains that learning symbols is not proof of advanced language
capacity. He argues that this is because they was were given
treats for producing the symbols. Thus, this is
a trained behavior to obtain a reward. This opposes the reading’s
point that chimpanzees can learn the symbols have
advanced language capacity.
On top of that, he
(he가 누군지 명시하세요.)contends that the
chimpanzees may be able to produce some meaningful
sounds. However, the lecturer states that they
can’t produce a lots of sounds like humans do. He goes on to say that the chimps’ vocal organs are poorly developed in comparison with people’.
This contradicts the
reading’s claim that the chimps can produce a variety of
meaningful sounds.
Finally, the
lecturer argues that although chimpanzees can combined symbols, a structure and length to form sentences is
limited. However, he says that humans can
combined symbols with lots of lengths
and structures and in length.
This refutes the
reading’s point that they can make to be equivalent to sentence
produced by humans.