▶ Your Answer : Both
the reading passage and the lecture deal with the topic of flog population. The
main ideas of the reading passage are that the a number of the flog population
is decline gradually because of using the pesticides by human, spreading the
fungus and reducing frog's habitats, whereas the professor argues a few points
presented in the reading.
First
of all, the professor contends that the idea of prohibiting the pesticide is
not a good way when we think the economic loss. The professor goes on to
explain that if we cannot allow farmers to use the pesticides, their
productivity of crops might be severely reduced. This contradicts the reading
passage's claim that preventing pesticides will be really helpful the human.
Moreover,
the professor asserts that antifungal meditation and treatment can cause other
problems. Additionally, the professor illustrates that antifungal meditation
cannot adopt large scale of flogs since they have different and complicated
skin type, so we might be spend a lot of money. This casts doubt on the reading
passage's argument that if we applied the meditation on the large scale, would
prevent sensitive frog populations from infection.
Finally,
the professor insists that making suitable habitats for flogs are not
influential factor solved the problem. To be specific, the professor refutes
that global warming is most powerful factor can decline flog habitats. So
making frog's habitats are no use increasing the population of flogs. This
opposes the reading passage, which mention is that key water habitat are better
water use and development, many frog species would recover.
|