▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer claims that Sinosauropeteryx
had feathers on the body. This contradicts the reading's assertion that the
Sinosauropeteryx is not a feathers-dinosaur.
First point made in the reading is that the
traces of the Sinosauropeteryx was damaged during excavating. The lecturer,
however, challenges this view by arguing that the fossils were undamaged. To be
more specific, the Sinosauropeteryx fossils were well-preserved fossils. The
line means that the Sinosauropeteryx has unique feathers. Other fossils do not
have that line. The line shows the existence of the feathers.
Another point that the article put an
emphasis on is that the Sinosauropeteryx had not the feathers, but rather
frills. In the contrast, the lecturer contends that the Sinosauropeteryx
fossils have shown chemical protein that belongs to not frills, but feathers. If the
Sinosauropeteryx had the frills, the chemical factor would have undetected from
the fossil.
Finally, it is stated in the reading that
the feather did not have any functional role on the body. On the contrary, it
is highlighted in the lecture that the feather was used as an attractive purpose
for mating. She further indicates that the feathers had white and orange
colors. The colorful feathers used for mating. Some other birds also uses the
feathers as the same way.
Good (24–27) 두번째 본문 -in contrast 혹은 on the contrary 입니다. -have p.p
세번째 본문 -수동태는 be p.p. 형태입니다 본문마다 마지막에 좀더 맺는 식으로 ~해서 lecturer이 the author을 rebut 한다로 마무리 해주시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고하셨습니다~
|