▶ Your Answer : The lecturer takes a skeptical point of view and argues that the benefits of GM crops are overestimated, which contradicts to the claim in the reading passage.
First of all, the professor mentions that the possibility of GM crops as the solution of world hunger is not realistic. It is because a problem is not a shortage of food, but an unequal distribution of food. Even if GM crops increase the amount of crop yields, as it is shown in the reading passage, the poor will not won’t be able to access food. Therefore, it could not couldn’t be a solution of starvation.
Secondly, the lecturer refutes the claim that GM crops will reduce the price of food. She says that it is not true and maintains that it will rather make the price of food more costly. Since the company investing GM crops expect profits, as a result, costs for food will increase. Moreover, as GM crops require more water to grow, we need to take account of the additional cost for water as well.
Good (24–30)
첫번째 본문 -축약형 지양해주세요. won't--> will not, couldn't--> could not 두번째 본문 -띄어쓰기는 한 칸만 해주세요.
내용 정리 괜찮습니다.
수고하셨습니다~~
Last, the speaker casts doubt of the statement that GM crops will make vaccines more available. However, fruit plants that are used for genetic modification in order to develop edible vaccines, such as bananas and tomatoes, spoil very quickly. Therefore, they have to be kept cool, which is not likely to be more widely available.
|