▶ Your Answer : There are some disagreements over whether or not the best way to grasp a country is by visiting their museums. Some people belive believe that museums involves show a great variety of remains that represent a country. My view, however, is that visiting museums is not the best way to understand a country. This is because that there is a difference in different generation and era. Moreover, visiting museums is not effective. To begin with, the evidences artifacts in museums is are the characteristics of the past. This means that foreign people foreigners can find it be difficult to understand the characteristics of the modern society through the evidences. The remains had been used mainly in the past. In the present, such remains is are hard to discover in modern society and people cannot utilize the remains. With the advanced science and the globalization, the contemporary society is able to have distinguished culture in comparion to the past. Albeit people know remarkable charateristic of the traditional society, and they cannot assimilate into modern culture and life in a country. For example, when I was in high school, I had an opportunity to go to United states. When I went to Metropolitan in New York at first, I could aborb a wide range of information about the history of U.S. However, I did not know about the culture of U.S in an accurate manner. When I walked into a road and watched a wide variety of landscapes, I could learn about how they have lived. In addition, visiting museums would make their valuable time go into waste. Museums incorporates limited information in terms about the on a country, which makes people misunderstand. This is due to the fact that main knowledge in a museum is related to found remains that is does not reflected reflect the lifestyle of a country the people in the present. By examining the remains, people might think that a country adheres to the its traditional method. Rather, talking with citizens or listening to music of produced within a counry country would be more efficiency better to understand a country. According to the study conducted by a team at Korea University, foreign people foreigners responded that they could understand the culture of a country when they made friends of a within that country more than when they visted museums. By the reseach,The research shows that making friends of a in a country county and having a lot of oppotunites to talk with them would be better to comprehend a counery.that country.
To conclude, the geration generation and era have been has changed, which suggests that the artifacts presented in the museums are no longer representative of that country and moreoverthus, there would be other more it is not effective way of knowing the country. Considering the above two reasons, it is eviedent evident that visiting museums is not the best way to figure out a country.
[Score]
17-18
[Feedback]
- 학생의 주장이 조금 약했습니다. 학생은 박물관에 가면 지금 사용되고 있는 것 들을 못 봐서 그 나라의 대해 못 배운다고 썼는데 박물관에 가면 그 나라의 역사와 그 나라가 어떻게 지금 모습으로 변했는지에 대해 배울 수 있다는 점도 알고 더 자세히 설명 하시길 바랍니다.
- 그리고 두 argument가 조금 비슷합니다. 주의하세요.
- 단수 복수 수 일치 주의하세요. |