In the given set of information, both the
reading passage and the lecturer discuss the use of brain scan lie detectors. The lecturer casts doubt on the author's assertion
that brain scan lie detectors can accurately
measure neural activity, by presenting three compelling counter-arguments.
First, the lecturer asserts that true statements
can be considered as dishonest, despite the use of the
brain scan detector. For instance, a person may suppress
truthful information when asked an embarrassing
question. Although this is just to avoid a sensitive topic,
brain scan may still indicate that the person is being dishonest.
This refutes the author's claim that true statements are always indicated
correctly by the detector.
Second, the lecturer claims that interpretation
is inaccurate as each person's brain functions differently. The lecturer
says that there is no standard way to analyse analyze
the results objectly objectively. He goes on to say that misinterpretation would
increase when experts are involved to interpret the results. This counters the
author's assertion that results of brain detectors
can be interpreted objectly objectively.
Lastly, the lecturer indicates that it is more
easier to fool the brain scan detector than the conventional polygraph. For
example, when a person is solving a mathematical problem, while answering a
question, one can mask lies. Moreover, rehearsed
lies can be disguised as honesty. This refutes the author's statement that it
is difficult to intentionally trick brain scans.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
17 |
Overall
Comment: |
전체적으로 두 글을 잘
비교하셨지만, 문법 오류가 많고, 철자 오류도 있어서 감점을 드렸습니다. 위 지적사항들을 참고하세요. |
|
|