▶ Your Answer :
According to the reading passage, ~. However, in the lecture, the lecturer argues that the reading’s
point is groundless. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim
that the Laocoon is a forgery carried out by Michelangelo.
To begin with, she contends that Michelangelo
might not have forged the Laocoon to fool his rival, Sangallo. This is because
Sangallo was a close friend of Michelangelo. Besides, Sangallo invited
Michelangelo to help identify The Laocoon. This opposes the reading’s point that Michelangelo wanted to fool Sangallo because they were rivals.
On top of that, the speaker maintains that the
forgery theory was not true since ~ (왜 사실이 아니라고 믿는지에 대해 간단히 요약해주세요). The reason is that Michelangelo was influenced by the Laocoon, Which explained the similarity between two works. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that the
resemblance between the Laocoon and the Last Judgement prove that Michelangelo
forged the Laocoon.
Finally, the lecturer claims that the forgery was
considered an offense during the Renaissance. To practice, young artists reproduced classic works. Duplications were
different from forgeries. Forgery was a fraud. This contradicts the reading’s point that forgery
was a common artistic practice.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
FAIR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- 관사 실수 및 기타 오타 주의해주세요. - 각 paragraph에서 "reading의 입장에 반대하여 lecturer는 ~ 한 이야기를 한다" 처럼 맨 첫 문장에 RC/LC대조점을 분명하게 작성해주세요. |