▶ Your Answer : As far as the Yellowstone fires are concerned, the lecturer takes a stand that opposes the thesis of the reading and presents counter arguments. Specifically, the lecturer does not sympathize with the reading's view and claims that the fire did not always bring negative effects. In the first place, the lecturer points out that Yellowstone fires led to a diversity of vegetation. This is attributed to the reason that the dead trees gave small trees an opportunity to take over the space and grow up. Also, the fires were beneficial for seeds in need of the heat for germination. This directly contradicts the reading that the natural fires destroyed the Yellowstone's vegetation. (GOOD) Secondly, the speaker goes on to say that the change of vegetation allowed new animals to thrive. For example, the rabbit populations could increase, thanks to the fires; they made the food chains well-balanced. This tarnishes the impact of the reading that the wildlife in the park was harmed by the fires. Last but not least, the lecturer concluded ( 무엇이라 결론지었는지 내용 작성 필요 )by saying that it is very unusual for the fire to occur every year. Therefore, this did not affect the economy and the number of tourists. Furthermore, the fires were not accompanied by strong winds or high rainfall, so local businesses rarely got serious influence. This casts doubt on the reading that the fires would have caused several local economic problems
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- 각 RC/LC 입장이 잘 정리되어 있습니다. - 예시는 전부 과거에 일어났던 일이므로 시제 고려해서 작성해주세요. |