▶ Your Answer :The lecturer challenges the thesis of the passage which opposes online drug selling with three grounds. First of all, the professor believes that procuring drug online is a right for an individual. Even if there's a possibility of buying medicines that controversial in terms of safety and law, in her perspective, what medication to take is up to one's own determination, not by others. For example, if an internationally-released medicine is not available domestically because of approval procedures by the authorities, he or she has to import medicine by online for maintaining its health which cannot be replaced with any other things. Secondly, the professor comes up with an idea that online drug sales is a lot more safer than the traditional way. Contrary to the article which suggests that shoppers can make an error while writing a questionnaire required for buying medicine online, the lecturer contradicts that conventional health counseling could be more detrimental as a patient can only get advice from only one doctor. As various doctors offer numerous advisories online, she strongly contends that buying medicine on the web is a much smarter way. Lastly, it is more cost-effective. In the U.S., the cost of medicine is so expensive that some people cannot afford it. If new method for possessing medicine gets underway, patients in the U.S. can save from 50 to 80 percents of their current fees spent for treatment. This advantage surpasses the side-effects given by the passage that buyers have to buy cheap medicines in bulk from overseas. |