▶ Your Answer : The lecturer argues that the cause of
TLPs is just an illusion. This contrasts the reading passage’s claim that the three
causes of TLPs are plausible.
First, the lecturer suggests that the
clouds of lunar gas observed around craters are just coincidence because of the
number of craters. In addition, the probe is not sure how much gas has omitted from
the craters. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that one of the
causes of TLPs is the clouds of gas leaking from beneath the surface of the
Moon.
Second, the lecturer explains that there
is no evidence of dust on the Moon. To be specific, dust should be large in
order to be visible. However, there has never been an indication of that.
Although it existed very little dust, astronomers confirmed that the surface of
the Moon was free of dust. This counters the reading passage’s claim that one
of the causes of TLPs is the dust floating over lunar landscape.
Lastly, the lecturer asserts that there
are no correlation between data of TLPs and data of solar flares. They
sometimes matched up and sometimes didn’t. This refutes the reading passage’s
claim that TLPs are caused by the solar radiation called solar flares, which
illuminated parts of Moon’s surface.
Question 1. 시제는
과거로 써야
하는지요? 현재완료와
섞어서 써도
될까요?
Question 2. 일반명사에는
a, the를 붙이지
않고 그냥
쓰는 것이
가능한가요? 가능하다면
뜻이 어떻게
바뀌나요? |