▶ Your Answer : The lecturer is making a point that the advantages of the wave farms are just an the illusion. However, the reading passage argues that wave farms will be more likely to be common in the future, meaning that they are beneficial enough to give positive impacts.
First of all, the woman shows her opinion that the disruption to the power generation occurs by the technical issues. With the new system, the converter malfunctions, and fluctuates with the amount of power produced. Opposite to the lecture, the reading suggests that wave farms are incredibly reliable generators of power. It is because they use waves that are constant and predictable, which allows controlling the generation capacity of a wave-power facility.
Moreover, the lecturer argues that the dismissal of the harmful chemicals from the wave farms will definitely harm the ocean ecosystem of the ocean (기존의 표현도 문법상 문제가 있는 건 아닌데, 이렇게 적는 게 조금 더 문어에 가깝습니다.). The substances are mostly toxic and can give severe damage to the living creatures in the ocean. This opinion contradicts with the idea which reading passage suggests that the process does not involve buying fossil fuels and does not have any risk of contaminating the ocean.
Lastly, she mentions the negative impact on nature and its beauty. She says that the floating converter has to be covered in bright colors which will be easily noticed by the visitors on the beach. While she claims the converter will make a negative visual impact, the reading passage suggests that there will be no harmful effects on the surrounding landscape.
총평: 큰 문제 없이 잘 작성해주신 것 같습니다. 두 지문 및 이들의 관계를 잘 비교해주셨고, 표현상 어색한 부분도 거의 없었으므로 충분히 좋은 점수를 받으실 수 있을 것으로 보이네요. 수고하셨습니다 :) |