■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer in listening and the author of the reading passage are both talking about cloud seeding. The lecturer in listening contents that cloud seeding is unpredictable methods. This goes against the reading passage's claim that cloud seeding would solve the large hailstorm problem. First, the lecturer in listening argues that labs experiment is just labs. This is because the natural environment is dynamic so that cloud seeding method can create a disaster to our nature, unlike the experiment. This contradicts contradict the reading passage's idea that new cloud seeding skill developed in labs will help to reduce the hailstorm problem. (리스닝 디테일 더 들어주세요)
Second, the lecturer in listening insists that cloud seeding which was implemented in china might not apply to the US. This is because both large cities like Shanghai and Beijing in China have large air pollution so that this cannot be same in US which has little pollution. This casts doubts on the the reading passage' point that cloud seeding can apply the US to reduce hail as same as China did.
The final point by the lecturer in listening states that researches in Kansas do not warranty to confirm that the cloud seeding will be effective. This is because the Kansas is not a unique area less precipitation than the past since it was a broad effect in the US. Therefore, local effect in Kansas cannot be expanded to the other area regardless of the researches. This rebuts the author of the reading passage's assertion that the studies in Kansas proved that cloud seeding had positive effects on weather modification. |
|
사소한 문법 오류에 유의해주시고, 관사에 조심해주세요.
리스닝 디테일도 더 필요합니다. 수고하셨습니다 :)