▶ Your Answer : The reading passage and lecture are both about Hanging Gardens of Babylon. The reading passage contends that the garden had existed for three evidence. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes the idea by bringing up three specific points.
First, the lecturer argues that ancient Greek records about Hanging Gardens is just imagination. This is because no one had visited to the gardens. In fact, it would be adventure stories like Indiana Jones movies. This goes against the reading passage's point that the garden had ascending terraces with enough soil and plants according to the Greek records.
Second, the lecturer points out that the Babylon people could not build the Hanging Gardens despite their great architectual crafts. This is due to the fact that they had to make the garden by clay which is necessary to keep moisty. If they made it by clay, it would be destroyed. This casts doubt on the reading passage's view that the Babylon's great constructions represents they could bulild the garden with ascending terraces.
The final point by lecturer is that the holes which discovered by the German researcher does not prove Hanging Gardens. The reason is that the holes were located in the middle of desert indicating it was not water pumps. In addition, the holes do not have close river. This rebuts the reading passage's claim that the three holes discovered could be a irrigation system used in the gardens.
에세이 잘 작성하셧습니다. lecturer from 무슨 passage인지 똑바로 명시해야 ,두 passage간의 구분이 확실해집니다 reading과 listening간의 balance는 잘 맞는 편입니다. 어휘는 조금식 반복되는 편이기도 하니, 조금 더 다양한 어휘나 표현들이 쓰일 수 있도록 공부 더 하시면 좋을 것 같아요. |