▶ Your Answer :
In the reading
passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that red rain, which is
a rare climatic phenomenon, appeared in Kerala and the event can be
explained rationally which can be explained rationally. However, the professor in the lecture gives several
reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
To
begin with, the lecturer argues that it is far-fetched. Because an expert said that
5 million bats have to be destroyed at the exact same time to reach the same
amount as the rain. Also, the event does not contain wings and bones of
the animal. This opposes the reading passage’s claim that the phenomenon (is
made up) of the blood of bat which attacked by a thunderstorm. are attacked by a thunderstorm
On
top of that, the professor points out that it is disproven the theory shown in the reading passage is not proven. To be specific, if
the volcanic eruption happened the rain triggered the rain, the phenomenon should have occurred in the Philippines, as well. However, the rain appeared only in the Indian state of
Kerala. This cast casts (this는 단수 주어 입니다) doubt on the reading passage’s claim that the volcano eruption
which consists of a lot of dust in the Philippines caused the event
Finally,
the lecturer asserts that there is no reason the chemical pollution is one of
the factors. To explain specifically, there are only a few factories in the area
where experienced the red rain people experienced the rain (주어가 없습니다). So if the pollutants from the factory triggered
the rain, other countries should undergo an identical phenomenon. This refutes
the reading passage’s claim that factories’ chimney with no filter in the Indian state of Kerala causes the red rain.
점수: 24 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 각 단락에서 리딩에 대한 부분을 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |