▶ Your Answer :
In this set of materials, both the lecturer and the writer deal with whether drug advertising is helpful to companies and doctors, customers. Regarding this issue, the lecturer refutes the writer’s claims.
To begin with, the lecturer runs counter to the first idea of the reading passage that doctors are informed of the latest drugs by drug advertising. The lecturer explains that doctors are not experts in pharmaceutical chemistry and cannot make decisions just by watching or reading drug advertisements. Also, after some patients eat new drugs, adverse reactions will occur in them. Thus, the lecture goes on to say that the first idea of the reading passage does not sound convincing.
On top of that, the lecturer contradicts the writer’s second idea that drug advertisements enable the public to be more knowledgeable in relation to drugs. The lecturer points out that words used by advertisements are not only fine-print, but also not readable with ease. To be specific, the speech is very fast and citizens have difficulty understanding certain terms. Therefore, the lecture asserts that the writer’s second idea is also disputable.
Finally, the lecturer casts doubt on the writer’s last idea that drug advertising can help to stop health problems. For example, if ulcer patients take over-the-counter drugs, their ulcer drugs will not work. Moreover, patients have to consult doctors before taking drugs not to have health problems. Hence, the lecturer claims that the writer’s last idea cannot be validated. |