▶ Your Answer :
The lecture claims that four-day workweek would not beneficial with the
economy, individual companies and employees. This contradicts the reading's
assertion that four-day workweek makes more efficient with all of them.
The first point made in the passage is that company profits would be
increased. The lecturer, however, challenges this particular viewpoint by
arguing that company's profits would be same to work five days. To be more
specific, he states that if companies starts four-day workweek, they require
employees to work overtime due to do same work quantity to 5 days work. So,
employees cannot do new jobs.
Another point the article puts an emphasis on is that the company can
hire more employees to use their money saving after doing four-day workweek. In
contrast, the lecturer contends that companies need to use more money in order
to hire new employees. He further indicates that if they hire new employees,
they need more computers and space to work. Furthermore, the lecturer points
out that new employees also should do training, and it also needs to use
money.
Finally, it is stated in the reading that individual employees have more
free time and that could improve the quality of their lives. On the contrary,
it is accentuated in the lecture that four-day workweek has some risk. He gives
details that the fewer they work, the more economy decreases. After economy
downturn, their career will be end.
|