▶ Your Answer : To make our country better, government supports us some helps, welfare. There are two kinds of welfare of flexible and universal. Each of these laws on welfare have both good and bad aspects. Based on that information, I defend the selective welfare than general. Here are some reasons that support my opinion. First of all, unlike north korean, our nation accepts capitalism. we have to work hard to get somethings we want. Therefore, this law makes us diligent and the country is being wealthy ultimately. With this case, I think the flexible welfare can bring us better results. If people get benefits regardless of the stratums and incomes, members of nation could have tendency to be somewhat lazy. Secondly, somewhat shame can give the poor a will to work. Supporters of general welfare insist that the beneficiaries of selective welfare will feel the shame and don't wanna be pitied. This is true but I think the shame can be the impetus of working. Because they don't want to be shame, they'll work harder to be independent. People have abilities to make enough money without exception therefore the selective welfare could give appropriate helps to the poor by providing fundamental needs. In contrast, if all people receive the same benefits, the will of the small income earners will be reduced. In succession, that the millionaires and the poor have same benefits don't make sense. The meaning of welfare is helping people to live in better environment. However, the wealthy are living in the best state and don't need to receive some helps. The people who really need that help is the poor. They are having a hard time to eat and sleep even those are basic things. Giving benefits to the rich same as the poor is wasting money. The cost for welfare would be more higher if it supports all people in nation. The beneficiaries of welfare have to be only the poor. To sum up, the propose of welfare is nice because it can give people in need a better life. There are also a good aspect of universal welfare. For example, not only the poor but the general people who have medium incomes can enjoy benefits too. In addition, people who have law incomes don't have to feel shame with receiving the needs. However, I think the flexible welfare can induce the better results with these reasons. I hope all people have good lives with the appropriate welfare. |