▶ Your Answer :
People are all grow up with parents and use most of their young ages with them. As time passes parents try to guide and lead their children to the way that they think right. However, people can learn little from their parents than peers for the following two reasons.
FIrst of all, becoming peers means people take each other for the same level of respectible existence, which means it is easier get familiar to one another. And it can be drived to the simple common sense that people with their mind opened can to persuade themselves with less difficulty. it is clearly compared to the fact that one-way communications hardly can make it possible to make one to take good words as theirs, which is often said to be made between old people and youths. For example, juviniles are inclined to find their frineds more dependible rather than their parents because they think the communication between friends has more good effect and fun. It seems to be apparent that peers can learn more from their society.
Secondly, because there is less or no generation gap between peers, their social conditions are similar and people can earn direct advice, which is impossible in the opposite claim. For instance, one research has made a poll with the topic of 'the communication of people, which is the most prefered way?'. In the poll, it was turned out to be true that most of the people dislike to have long conversation with elderly people for the reason the advice of them is not helpful because the era they have lived is too far. Moreover, it is found that people with only 1~5 years of age gap can courage each other to socialy improve. Therefore, a person can learn more from the people in their ages.
Even though it is true that old people are intent to tell educational stories to younger people and do they those things in benefactorical manner, it seems that people still can learn more from the people in their ages rather than elders.
|