▶ Your Answer :
In this set of materials, both the lecturer and the writer deal with whether multinational corporations benefit customers. Regarding this issue, the lecturer refutes the writer’s claims.
First of all, the lecturer contradicts the first idea of the reading passage that multinationals’ expenses decline due to economies of scale from increased output. The lecturer mentions that multinational corporations hardly pass savings to customers. Also, multinational corporations’ monopolies enable products to be higher in price and lower in quality. Therefore, the lecturer goes on to say that the first idea of the reading passage cannot be validated.
On top of that, the lecturer casts doubt on the writer’s second idea that access to a wider selection of products is allowed due to multinationals. The lecturer explains that customers tend to buy the same type of products because of the homogenization. To be specific, various and remarkable cultures resemble one another. Thus, the lecturer claims that the writer’s second idea is also disputable.
Finally, the lecturer runs counter to the writer’s last idea that multinationals helped local economies. The lecturer points out that local businesses wiped out. Furthermore, multinationals didn’t observe labor standards and pay their employees well. Hence, lecturer asserts that the writer’s last idea does not sound convincing. |