▶ Your Answer :
Some
people argue that measuring more budgets to protect the environment than to
explore outer space is important. However, as far as I am concerned, I strongly
agree with the argument that spending money on researching outer space is much
more essential than spending money on just preserving the environment. This is because
it is cost-effective to assist space exploration. Another reason to support my opinion
is that people can protect the environment in daily-lives. In this essay, I
will briefly present two main reasons to support my idea.
To
begin with, it is more cost-effective to investigate money on exploration of
outer space than preservation of the environment. To be more specific, it is true
that there are endless possibilities in the universe, so that it would be able
to find new discoveries such as a planet like the earth or other living species
if countries spend larger amount of money on space exploration. Frankly
speaking, even though a large quantity of money is given to environmental policies,
it might almost impossible to make the environment get better than the current
situation.
On
top of that, there is no need to provide a lot of money to preserve the
environment because saving the environment can be even executed in our
daily-lives. What I mean is that, to prevent the environment from pollution can
be simply performed by habitual activities. To exemplify what I mean, without
any financial support, we can take public transportations to reduce
air-pollution. When you are in home, you can even diminish water usages by
taking a shower rather than taking a bath.
In
conclusion, I firmly maintain that it is more crucial to spend money on research
of outer space than prevention of the environment on account of the reasons
that I mentioned above, investing money on exploration of outer space is more cost-effective
and it is safe to say that protecting the environment can be done in routine-life. |